Until I figure this out, consider the following added: --- update 6:44 GOD [Green Day - When September Ends] ON AGAIN!!!! IT MAKES ME WANT TO DIE
Previously on Emosnail Two Years and a Week Ago Yesterday:Brown Act Ethics - Though the Brown Act does not presume to apply to every little non-governmental organization, the ethical sentiments expressed in it are transferable. The subject of this entry is the explusion of non-officers from executive meetings of Davis MUN. I don't know whether they still do, but I know other organizations also regularly exclude non officers from the officer meetings, and I think you should know that that is probably not ethically defensible. ALSO: "The idea that career employees may act with impunity to the Court is to accept that they do not work among us at the employ of the ASUCD government but rather supervise an incompetent student play-government. I need hardly point out that the latter precept which is necessary for the argument in favor of their impunity is insulting to anyone that participates in the ASUCD government." After some convincing testimony by Mark Champagne, we concluded that "it is clear that at the time of the original writing of the Judicial Codes, the possibility that this situation could arise was not anticipated. By accident of writing therefore, the Codes could have indicated either way. Despite extreme ambiguity, it appears that the Codes expected Defendants always to be undergraduate students of UC Davis" (Case # 24). HOWEVER, in a terribly constructed sentence, we clarify: "We find not that the ASUCD Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction over university employee union members, but specifically that the codes imply that they cannot act as Defendants in our court system. There is no reason to believe they are exempt from Court Orders that do not impose direct disciplinary action upon them."
Intended Update
---
update 6:44 GOD [Green Day - When September Ends] ON AGAIN!!!! IT MAKES ME WANT TO DIE
Previously on Emosnail
Two Years and a Week Ago Yesterday: Brown Act Ethics - Though the Brown Act does not presume to apply to every little non-governmental organization, the ethical sentiments expressed in it are transferable. The subject of this entry is the explusion of non-officers from executive meetings of Davis MUN. I don't know whether they still do, but I know other organizations also regularly exclude non officers from the officer meetings, and I think you should know that that is probably not ethically defensible.
ALSO: "The idea that career employees may act with impunity to the Court is to accept that they do not work among us at the employ of the ASUCD government but rather supervise an incompetent student play-government. I need hardly point out that the latter precept which is necessary for the argument in favor of their impunity is insulting to anyone that participates in the ASUCD government." After some convincing testimony by Mark Champagne, we concluded that "it is clear that at the time of the original writing of the Judicial Codes, the possibility that this situation could arise was not anticipated. By accident of writing therefore, the Codes could have indicated either way. Despite extreme ambiguity, it appears that the Codes expected Defendants always to be undergraduate students of UC Davis" (Case # 24). HOWEVER, in a terribly constructed sentence, we clarify: "We find not that the ASUCD Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction over university employee union members, but specifically that the codes imply that they cannot act as Defendants in our court system. There is no reason to believe they are exempt from Court Orders that do not impose direct disciplinary action upon them."