Ok , I will attempt to break up my thought and clarify.
1) I don't think that we should take simply the US context for what ought to be the case in marriage. Note that at one point inter-racial marriage was illegal in many parts of the US as one fast example.
2) It was really unclear to me what you ment by "the absolute". You could have ment it to represent the unity of God for all I could tell from the short writing of an LJ comment.
3) If you mean it in terms of trust and bond, I see no reason why we should not allow 3 people to try and build that kind of trust and bond together.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 09:58 pm (UTC)1) I don't think that we should take simply the US context for what ought to be the case in marriage. Note that at one point inter-racial marriage was illegal in many parts of the US as one fast example.
2) It was really unclear to me what you ment by "the absolute". You could have ment it to represent the unity of God for all I could tell from the short writing of an LJ comment.
3) If you mean it in terms of trust and bond, I see no reason why we should not allow 3 people to try and build that kind of trust and bond together.