aggienaut: (snail)
[personal profile] aggienaut

   The following poll is mostly for testing purposes.. which isn't to say you shouldn't vote on it in an accurate and complimentary manner.

   In other news it is currently 9:45am and I'm in the on campus computer lab. Walked forty minutes to campus this morning at 5am (because the buses weren't running yet).. at first I thought I'd have to wreak a terrible vengeance upon the entertainment council persons for not being abundant when I got here, but they showed up at 6:30 with doughnuts to appease me.
   My current plans are to go to financial aid and try to squeeze some more money out of them, and then to return to my lair and participate in some serious sleeping.


NOTE: In general higher numbers equal greater amounts of the subject of the poll question (more (better) writing functionality, more amusing entries, more relevance), but to keep with the pattern of higher numbers equal more satisfaction we shall say that the inverse is true for the "lengthiness" category: higher numbers do not equal MORE lengthiness but greater satisfaction with the length of entries. If you voted contrary to this you can change your vote at any time.
[Poll #294601]

Date: 2004-05-17 10:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nibot.livejournal.com
now, you didn't tell us whether high numbers == good, or high numbers == bad.

Date: 2004-05-17 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
generally high numbers can be expected to represent a larger amount of something - ie a larger amount of accuracy, lengthiness, unbiased-ness and so on.

Date: 2004-05-17 09:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nibot.livejournal.com
generally, yes, but not always. But does higher on the lengthiness mean that your journal entries are longer than usual, or that they are closer to the best length than usual?

- 500 culture points

Date: 2004-05-17 11:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] impotent-dream.livejournal.com
I have taken your poll. It was fun and educational. *kiss*

Date: 2004-05-18 08:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stumbleine.livejournal.com
spelling, grammer & general writing functionality

dude. it's grammar. i almost gave you a two. :)

what a funny word! grammar!

grammar

Date: 2004-05-19 12:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
haha uhhhh I did that to illustrate what constitutes an error in that category.. uhhh yea thats it ::shifty eyes::

(=

May 2026

S M T W T F S
     12
34 5 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 8th, 2026 10:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios