aggienaut: (Default)
[personal profile] aggienaut

This is my 37th post in 30 days. 30 days ago seven brave (foolish) "megabloggers" took a solomn vow to write one entry every day during the month of June. These legendary bloggists were [livejournal.com profile] stephenl, [livejournal.com profile] shekb, [livejournal.com profile] apoplecticfittz, [livejournal.com profile] madchenfittz, [livejournal.com profile] incomple, [livejournal.com profile] tonyz, [livejournal.com profile] feuders. Thirty days later several had suffered gruesome death under the burden of 30 in 30, yet new livejournalists eagerly took their place! [livejournal.com profile] stephenl, [livejournal.com profile] shekb and [livejournal.com profile] tonyz had dropped out only to be replaced by [livejournal.com profile] emosnail and [livejournal.com profile] lerani.
   [livejournal.com profile] lerani in fact apparently made 40 posts in 30 days, beating even me. ::shakes fist::

   While everyone else will probably return to posting 4.3 times a month (though I notice [livejournal.com profile] incomple has posted again already), I'm not going as far away, as I will probably return to my previous 26.2 entries. If you are terribly inconsolable without me flooding your friends list and are particularly emphatic about wanting me to up my post levels again I MIGHT be persuaded to go up to 27.3 entries per month but I don't make any promises.

   I'd write a more researched best of 30 in 30 entry like Lerani's but I once again spent all evening in a fetal position on my bed and now have ten minutes to midnight. Do I get a prize for posting closest to the wire?

   In summary, this is a crappy finale as compared to everyone elses, but I'd like to feebly defend myself with a quote nearly every other member of 30 in 30 used today: "I HATE YOU ALL AND HOPE YOU DIE"

   Goodnight everyone, you'll be seeing a lot less of me on your friends list.

Re: in conclusion

Date: 2004-07-01 01:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nibot.livejournal.com
are you being ironic?

anyway, "meta-" is a prefix often used to mean something to the effect of "belonging to one layer up" in the sense of a self-reference. i.e., metadata is data that describes data.

particularly awful daily cal columnists sometimes lapse into meta-columns --- columns about how they write their columns, or columns about how hard it is to come up with a column. she was quite properly ridiculed for this. i mean, it's okay once, but not as a substitute for actual content. then you start having meta-meta-columns, etc etc.

hence my opinion that meta-posts shouldn't count. i mean, you could just write "hoo-ha! this is post number 27!" or "boy, coming up with posts is hard. i'll call this a post!" but what does that accomplish?

Re: in conclusion

Date: 2004-07-01 10:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emd.livejournal.com
"boy, coming up with posts is hard. i'll call this a post!" but what does that accomplish?

bravo.

Re: in conclusion

Date: 2004-07-01 11:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
So you loathe this ingenius post?

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 14th, 2026 07:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios