aggienaut: (asucd)
[personal profile] aggienaut
The opinion on Nanakul v. SGAO (Case 32)- regarding the missing Student Bill of Rights - is officially out. As promised, the Student Bill of Rights is attached.

Among other things, we basically found that it is ridiculous to say that the Student Government Administrative Office (SGAO) cannot be compelled to do things by other parts of the government (in fact its very purpose seems to be to execute administrative tasks for other parts of the government), and noted that their position is actually so precarious as that as it currently stands, there is utterly nothing stopping the ASUCD President from dissolving the office or moving it into the basement on a whim. (As it is not mentioned anywhere in the codes (except where tasks are given to it), the office has no "institutional rights.")

BUT if the Senate gives them substantial new duties without increasing their resources, they can hardly be blamed for not keeping up. We find that the Senate's overtasking of them does not render them legally deficient.

Re: also

Date: 2006-03-08 06:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
Did you mean to write 38 instead of 48? Why 38?

Re: also

Date: 2006-03-09 09:58 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You wrote #38 in the document that you posted. Sorry if I wasn't clear on that point. I was just quoting that area.

-The Anonymous First Year

Re: also

Date: 2006-03-09 10:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
Oh found it, fixed.

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 15th, 2026 03:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios