ASUC Antics
Oct. 13th, 2006 01:53 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Basically, it looks like the Supreme Court of ASUC Berkeley found the president-elect to have become disqualified. President-elect Oren Gabriel then sued the ASUC Judicial Council (their Court) in the local Superior Court. The Superior Court judge summarily dismissed the case because all internal ASUC avenues of resolution had not been exhausted -- there was still an appeal pending before the Judicial Council -- but not before Gabriel managed to incur $22,679 in legal fees.
The President's party with allied parties "UNITE Greek" & "APPLE Engineering"1 control 14 of 20 senators, and have authored a bill to reimburse the president for his legal fees. Opponents, including opposition party CalSERVE, argue that since the legal action was unnecessary, it is unfair to use student fees to support it.
1Apparently they've discovered the secret that if you make your name an acronym it'll keep getting typed up in all-caps, not that anyone here in ASUCD or at EMOSNAIL would ever stoop to that
In a recent debate in ASUCD about a bill to reduce spending limits for ASUCD campaigns, someone commented "I really don't know why people even spend $250 to get elected." Well, apparently, some people are willing to spend $22,679 for equivalent positions.
I think he should not only not get reimbursed, he should have to record the expense as a campaign expenditure. (=
In Other News the ASUCD Senate voted 1-11-0 today NOT to pay the increased fee UCSA wanted from us. It is believed by many that UCSA will consequently deny our right to vote in their governance and we will therefore secede.
Picture of the Day

ASUCD Senator Jonathon "Tiny" Sanders demonstrates his technique for tabling for Prop 89
oh dear...
Date: 2006-10-13 09:46 am (UTC)This is what I get for watching anime with a secret (anti?)christian commentary.
Re: oh dear...
Date: 2006-10-13 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 04:33 pm (UTC)Lloydian Philosophy
Date: 2006-10-13 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-13 08:43 pm (UTC)Always nice when Berkeley's antics make what goes on the 3rd floor look pedestrian.
ASUC
Date: 2006-10-13 08:50 pm (UTC)"ASUCD Court files case against ASUC(B) President for his actions against ASUC(B) Court!"
no subject
Date: 2006-10-14 08:03 am (UTC)I actually see moves like this as a threat to autonomy of student governments systemwide, as well as additional encouragement for elections lawsuits. Add to this that they're considering this bill in closed session!!!
I think we need to have a talk with ASUC pretty soon.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-14 08:31 pm (UTC)"If you are mad you should contact the 13 Senators that have betrayed you. If you voted for Dmitri Garcia of the Defend Affirmative Action Party then you probably condone shakedowns of ASUC funds for unfounded legal fee payments." --haha thats great.
Wow after having reviewed all those sources, they are mind-blowingly corrupt.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-16 12:09 pm (UTC)