aggienaut: (fish)
[personal profile] aggienaut
   This probably makes no sense

  And I'm certainly not going to explain it.


Its not about me,
And its not a case of morals,
Its a question that must be asked,
An issue you must resolve,
and its not about me.

Its a question you've been hiding from,
A question I can't ask you,
An answer I may suspect,
An answer you know deep down.
Its not about me,
and deep down we both know that.

More possible answers

Date: 2003-05-08 09:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
Haha I was so thinking of doing something like that myself. I managed to resist thus far but now...
I'll just add on to your list:

11. a goat
12. a little to the left
13. can you uh define that please?
14. I can neither confirm nor deny that.
15. I deny it all.
16. You can't prove I did it, no one saw me do it!
17. It was the one-armed man!
18. I can see dead people!
19. Jackson Pritt
20. For basically

THE answer

Date: 2003-05-10 11:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roxymartini.livejournal.com
after much deliberation, i have decided thusly. the answer is this, and only this: it doesn't matter.
brilliant, isn't it? don't i get a nobel prize or something?

Re: THE answer

Date: 2003-05-10 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
Sadly thats the conclusion They so often come to.

And thats why I despise humanity.

I maintain that it is the only thing that really does matter.

Re: THE answer

Date: 2003-05-11 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roxymartini.livejournal.com
"the only thing that really does matter."
what can that be? according to humanity, that would be love. but according to kris? *ponders* hmmmm....
cheese danishes. no, he wouldn't ask me about those. fish. no, i know nothing about her. feelings of or about something/someone? no, he puts no value to feelings.

it must be about whether or not i realise something. chances are that i do. but without knowing more of the question, i prolly can't give a better answer.


Re: THE answer

Date: 2003-05-25 08:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
ah but its a question I can't ask you.

Re: THE answer

Date: 2003-05-29 02:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roxymartini.livejournal.com
the question, which i have determined to be a "why" or a "for what reason" question is henceforth obsolete because the assumption of the question, whilst perhaps once holding truth, now holds none. hallelujah, it is resolved!

Re: THE answer

Date: 2003-05-30 11:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
Ah but I think the questions now are yet more important and extensive, merely you have become content with the answers you have. As I said before, there's layers and layers of answers; and what is important is to never assume you're at the bottem.

It seems you've become exhasperated with my philosophies and gone into dismissive mode; wrapping up all remaining loose ends as swiftly as possible.

Re: THE answer

Date: 2003-05-30 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roxymartini.livejournal.com
what answer did you suspect?

i go the other way. you question to find obscured reasons. like Freud. i start with a decision or a thought. and then act as necessary to make my decision evident. instead of digging, i build. therefore, i know every step along the way, and the ideas of "questions" and "answers" are not applicable. i built a structure which i believe caused this attempt to prove mutually exclusive ideas to one another. sensing no end to the circularity of this argument, i demolished the structure. therefore, f(x) = x = 0

i do not experience exasperation, only increased fascination, if at first i don't understand. when irreconciliable contradictions occur in the philosophy, however, i tend to avoid it altogether.

note: avoidance is of the philosophy, not the philosopher. though it does become difficult because any discussion of the philosophy consequent seems to be an effort to "prove the philosopher wrong."

Re: THE answer

Date: 2003-06-03 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
Your sentiments are duly noted. I still believe there are underlying issues which could be discovered, you merely haven't the slightest interest in investigating them.

Re: THE answer

Date: 2003-06-10 01:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roxymartini.livejournal.com
a certain smile, of course. no, i explore that issue everyday, in everyway.

Re: THE answer

Date: 2003-06-10 02:40 pm (UTC)

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 14th, 2026 11:27 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios