LJ Idol Polls - Scapegoat
Feb. 28th, 2009 12:34 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yesterday I was standing in the middle of a 75 hive beeyard working, surrounded by bees, when I got a call. The office informed me that someone was posting on the OC Weekly saying we didn't have any bees. It would be funny if it wasn't so stupid.
Anyway, see this post for more about that headache.
As you may recall, I posted the other day about the first half of this week's LJ Idol polls. Today I bring you the other half. They wrote about "Scapegoat," and the poll close in only 3.5 hours (4pm my time).
[Poll #1356259] Additionally I wrote about this topic in my "home game" entry.
emo_snal recommendations are made entirely on a basis of whether or not the entry would be an interesting read to Joe Average Reader who is just looking for something worth reading. Disqualification for recommendation therefore usually occurs for being too long, with the second biggest cause usually being a lack of having "a point" interesting enough to warrant reading.
emo_snal recommends reading the following persons this week from this bracket:
1. boxsofrain's entry: The Possession of Love - Well written, just scandalous enough to keep dying to know where its going, and a very creative take on the topic.
Analysis of This Bracket
10 persons chose to write about "Scapegoat" (as opposed to 9 for "Achille's Heel." of those that wrote about Scapegoat:
90% wrote narratives
60% wrote personal narratives
1 wrote an essay style entry (Scienter)
3 wrote fiction
4 (40%!) were "too long" (I considered assigning a objective word or page count to "too long," but really the length changes depending on how engrossing the writing is)
2 I have as my primary notation that it just wasn't interesting
1 I classified as an "epic fail." And no I'm not going to tell you which one it is, that is too mean (even for me ;D ), but it was also too long.
1 had a disconcerting lack of character introduction that totally bungled an otherwise good story.
3 wrote about sex
2 wrote about abuse
Analysis of This Week on a Whole
78.9% wrote narratives
63.2% wrote personal narratives
21.1% wrote fiction
10.5% wrote essay entries
5.3% (ie 1) wrote historical fiction. (again, good work Brightflashes ;D )
10.5% wrote about exes
15.8% wrote about sex
10.5% wrote about abuse
10.5% wrote about parents
2 I classified as: OMGWTF O_o
Weekly Saturday Morning Drama Deep-Fry
There was a large discussion in the LJ Idol community the other day where people were claiming (1) "there's too much drama" and (2) Gary (the Administrater) needs to make a post outlining 'ground rules'"
In re (1): I am extremely curious what this drama everyone is talking about is as I have not seen it. I gather one prominant idolist apparently witnessed someone saying they didn't like her personally and is acting like it's the apocalypse, but is there anything else? Like, seriously, I'm at a total loss as to what people are talking about.
In re (2): I absolutely disagree that Gary should post some kind of kindergarten set of rules. I know of at least three Idolists who have expressed that they didn't like me PERSONALLY (blueashke,
xo_kizzy_xo and
spydielives (this last later retracted)), and, as the saying goes, I'll defend to the death their right to express such things. Oh and Dennis called me a cunt in a comment to my last entry, should I go crying to Gary about it?
We're all adults here and if you can't handle the harsh reality of things, maybe you shouldn't be here. People already make fun of LJ Idol as being too free of criticism, if kindergarten style behaviour rules are established, the community will be a real joke.
Note 2b: I applaud Gary for his handling of situations heretofore.
Note 3c: Maybe you disagree with me, and maybe you think I am an ogre for expressing the opinions I just have. I welcome and encourage you to post exactly what you think of me whereever the hell you feel like doing so. I, for one, can handle it.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 08:51 pm (UTC)Also, reload, I just added my weekly dose of drama. ;D
no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 08:56 pm (UTC)The fact that people go off on you and see you as some form of villain, when so far you've only done mostly harmless shit, is absolutely proof that some people are LOOKING for drama around every corner and will incite it when they get a chance...especially if it comes with an opportunity to drag a brother down. Though they also like picking on each other.
and you are right...I think Gary has done a pretty good job with the regulation thus far...last year was a bit shakier, but last year more people were attacking HIM, other than each other.
and, HA, your sister-in-law doesn't like you. your love child is going to have a hard time.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 09:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Stacey's Lack of Attraction to Kris
From:Re: Stacey's Lack of Attraction to Kris
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Relationships
From:Re: Relationships
From:Re: Relationships
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 09:20 pm (UTC)I can only recall actually seeing one person leave a negative comment to someone's post...and it caused a bunch of ridiculous "OMG, my life is over and I don't even belong in this competition, I guess" drama.
Wait...actually I got "you have two prepositions at the end of sentences" this week. Maybe I should call that person out in the green room. But they did say that I normally never do that...hmm...should I be pissed?
In any case, I'm not sure if criticism is part of a real "writing competition." That's more of a writer's workshop. Which most of these people would never try because they couldn't take the evisceration.
But it would be nice/funny/something to see all the people who go "I don't like so and so, they are getting by on their friend list" to actually tell that writer what they don't like each week. I've said that a few times and been greeted with "I don't have to say who I think is no good, I prefer to just make vague inferences to them and bitch about how I got eliminated."
no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 09:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 10:05 pm (UTC)Plus the voting totals suggest that I'm in a minority in my opinion a lot of the time.
I think you do get feed back, it's just more subtle. So lack of comments often equates to lack of votes and although you might not know *why* that entry wasn't liked, you do know that it wasn't appreciated by your target market. I don't know why the entry that got me voted off was the one that was considered to be that bad (but I've heard rumour that that was the week that dramas and game playing started to kick off, so I don't think it was entirely personal). I'm not that bothered either - I don't think Idol is the best way to improve your writing and that's not really what it's about. The recent kerfuffle and drama is ridiculous given what's at stake.
Now if a publishing deal were in the offing, I might understand it.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-02 09:03 pm (UTC)http://worldofmichelle.livejournal.com/4816.html and submitted as a Home Game entry for that week.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 09:03 pm (UTC)?!?!?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-01 03:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:What Does That Even Mean?
From:Re: What Does That Even Mean?
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 10:07 pm (UTC)2b) Completely agree.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 10:50 pm (UTC)And admit it, it's mine that is epic fail, no?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 11:09 pm (UTC)The reason I didn't, in the end, recommend it was becaue I wasn't sure people would really be into the fantistical creatures involved. Again though, I thought it was a really good entry.
(=
no subject
Date: 2009-03-02 12:18 am (UTC)The place wasn't real, and according to some feedback would probably have to be tweaked a bit to actually be believeable. I just used the first thing that came up and went with it, without worrying too much about accuracy lol.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 11:03 pm (UTC)I just stopped paying attention altogether after someone pretty much went off on their flist in general because OMG they only had x number of votes and there were y people on their flist so clearly we don't care! Oh yeah, and they decided to make the fact I didn't participate in general this year all about them didn't help either. But that's the only drama I'm aware of. And my guess is, it's the same person who's making an OMG world's ending issue about someone supposedly saying they don't like them. It'd be this person's style, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-28 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-01 07:39 am (UTC)I know it was one of the ones that were too long.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-01 09:10 am (UTC)The only notation I have on you is "a bit too long." (= But you're entry was very good, I came close to recommending it anyway.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-01 04:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-03-02 12:21 am (UTC)http://greg-kennedy.livejournal.com/108869.html