Competitiveness
Apr. 25th, 2009 12:33 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A picture of mine on flickr, of the Redding Sundial bridge:

Views: 2
Favourited: 0 times
Comments: 0
Now, an overexposed and all around mediocre picture of that same bridge by someone else on flickr:

Views: 15,720
Favourited: 149 times
Comments: a metric shit-ton.
Just goes to show the power of totally whoring out your pictures by posting them to 6 groups, and giving it 71 tags. Including such tags as "garden" "engineer" and a whole bunch of strange things like "interestingness=3" and "top-v444". Is this some voodoo that fools search engines into thinking it's more interesting than it actually is?
Though I guess now I'm gonna go put my own bridge pictures up on the bridge group. Maybe I can get a third view out of it.
Photo Idol!!
Now speaking of competing photos, (and totally whoring oneself out) I was thinking the other day about a "LJ Idol" style LJ Photo contest. With all due credit to LJ Idol and the illustrious LJ Idol administrator Gary of course.
But yeah, I'm taking a photo class at the local JC right now, and we have weekly assignments (this week I have to come up with some portraits /: ) and I was thinking, it's like LJ Idol but with photos! ...and not getting voted out.
Anyway, it seems to me highly likely that there already is such a contest on LJ. Anyone know anything about this?
30 in 30 VI!
And speaking of shenanigans, June is quickly approaching, which is traditionally the time for 30 posts in 30 days. The ultimate event of the blogosphere. No one get's voted out, but about 2/3rds of people who make the attempt just can't hack it. So who's up to join the brave and valiant 30 in 30 elite? (:
no subject
Date: 2009-04-25 07:38 pm (UTC)Sundial Bridge
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-25 07:51 pm (UTC)Frankly, I like the composition of the second photo better. It IS overexposed but there's a lot going on that draws the eye. I love the color of your photo but the scale of the thing is lost.
So, I think your photo certainly deserves more views but if you haven't tagged it more generally, no one is going to find it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Sundial Bridge
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-25 08:25 pm (UTC)30 in 30
Date: 2009-04-25 09:17 pm (UTC)Re: 30 in 30
From:Re: 30 in 30
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-25 10:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:30 in 30
From:Re: 30 in 30
From:Re: 30 in 30
From:Re: 30 in 30
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-26 06:34 am (UTC)I would definitely be interested in Photo Idol, or whatever you decide to call it.
30 in 30 sounds fun - I'd surely be willing to give it a try. All you have to do is post, right?
30 in 30
From:Re: 30 in 30
From:Re: 30 in 30
From:Re: 30 in 30
From:30 in 30
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-26 07:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-26 08:39 am (UTC)Better to talk them up, even if (especially if) they don't really deserve it. It makes you look professional and magnanimous.
.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-26 10:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-26 01:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:30 in 30
From:Re: 30 in 30
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-26 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-26 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 06:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 06:45 pm (UTC)Oh and you photograph, much better than the other. Don't whore yourself out, you want to still be able to respect yourself in the morning, right?
I belong to
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:30 in 30
From:Re: 30 in 30
From: