ASUCD INJUSTICE

[aggienaut]

   Yesterday was the quarterly State of the Court address at ASUCD Senate.
   I'm told that while I was reading our verdict from recent case # 23, President Sara Henry was grimacing hatefully. A number of the City Council candidates happened to be at the meeting, including former ASUCD Senator (from 1997), current UCD grad student & Aggie humor columnist Lamar Heystek. He told me that in his seven years of involvement in ASUCD he has never seen a Court that "could write Opinions like that."
   Most disturbing of all though, Heystek informed me that he had filed a case in the fall of 2002, which never went anywhere. Apparently the then Chief Justice (Katarina something) never returned any emails or phone calls... no response from the Court could be gotten at all. This is what I'm talking about when I say that the Court did NOT exist as a functioning entity previous to this. I wonder if his case is still pending.


   Also I just learned from a former Elections Committee member that last election they were considering compelling evidence that if accepted could disqualify the "Student Focus" candidates from the election, & ASUCD Advisor Vicki Swett told them not to accept the evidence because it would "create drama and controversy." This former committee member said they felt that what occured was very wrong but were unable to do anything about it because the hearing was confidential and they were thus forbade from talking to the Aggie or writing a case. Now that they're not on the Elections Committee they'd like to do something about it, but all evidence is still confidential and most witnesses are still on the committee. I am going to investigate legal recourses.


   Real update will come soon.


NOTE TO SELF: check one more time to make sure this is friends only

Comments

Re: B&F

[emosnail.livejournal.com]

Bah.. maybe I'll go to their meeting. I wasn't planning on concerning myself overlymuch about whether or not these court orders were carried out, but its starting to sound like the Association could greatly benefit from a certain amount of enlightenment being shed on B&F.


I was thinking about it in my spare time and again came to the solid conclusion that its ridiculous for B&F to be being told who they can and cannot audit. Its a crucial check/balance on everything.


You know offhand when their meetings are?

Re: B&F

[obisan69.livejournal.com]

Tuesdays at 6:30 in the Fielder room