Chancellor Vanderhoef READS THIS JOURNAL
Dec. 5th, 2003 01:01 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
At a Press Conference Wednesday evening UC Davis Chancellor Larry Vanderhoef made reference to "the Emosnail journal," in response to questions about ways he keeps in touch with student life and ASUCD activities.
Initially listed as one of several ways the Chancellor keeps up with student affairs, he elaborated that "there really was no accurate way to get a feel for the sum of activity within ASUCD until we discovered the Emosnail Journal. The staff at Emosnail really tell it like it is in a fair and impartial manner." He also commended the UC Davis livejournal community as a source of a wider range of more opinionated views. When asked if he was aware of the attempt to remove the ASUCD Chief Justice based on material in the Emosnail Journal, Vanderhoef explained "yes I'm aware of that, and I think it underscores the vital importance and relevance of the journal to ASUCD and the campus at large."
There was no other discussion of the journal during the press conference, but afterwords an Emosnail field operative happened to overhear some further informal discussion.
"I think it really brings the government closer to the students than it's ever been before. What'll happen now, for example, when Pavel Ivanov [quoted in the Senate and Aggie for calling the ASUCD President a "bitch"] runs into [ASUCD President] Sara Henry in the hall? Or what about "wdsguy" for that matter?" The Chancellor went on to discuss such tangent issues as Vice President Kalen Gallagher's hairstyles, his high opinion of the efforts of the ASUCD Environmental Planning Commission, speculation as to whether there'd be more closed sessions at the following Thursday (12/04/03)'s ASUCD Senate meeting, and his personal opinion of a number of the people and events portrayed in the Emosnail Journal.

Larry reviews his printed copies of Emosnail Journal Entries
In other news headlines coming soon:
Former Aggie Columnist John Green in Revolutionary Expose Reveals that "Soldiers Kill People"
Having allegedly gotten an exclusive interview with a drunk soldier, John Green reveals to the world that soldiers kill people. Article hailed as attempt by Green to regain respect as a real journalist.
Bush, Saddam, Meet on Emosnail Livejournal
having corresponded already for weeks in comments to the Emosnail Livejournal under secret screen names, US President George W Bush and former Iraqi Dictator Saddam Hussain suddenly were shocked to discover that they were corresponding together. Bush expressed regret that comments abotu who he thought was "a bitch" with faith they wouldn't reach their subject will now probably be spitefully aired on al-jazeera. Hussain expressed "distress" that he had revealed to Bush his secret disguise (a green mohawk as inspired by the example of a prominant figure in Emosnail Journal entries).
ASUCD Offical Condemned for Alleged Online Statements
A prominant member of ASUCD has been condemned by the ASUCD Senate because an email written to the online character "Strong bad" strongly parallelled actual ASUCD events, in the opinion of the accusors, and information in the email can be construed to represent information the defendant never should have had in the first place. ASUCD Senate members immediately vowed to pursue the issue until they achieved removal, vengeance, and death. Later they clarified that when death was mentioned they were discussing the state of some of their social lives.
The following is false: everything mentioned in this entry
The following is true: this entry was compiled by no less than three individuals, does not constitute anything a rational person may believe, does not reflect real opinions of any members of ASUCD or the Campus Administration, and is not associated with any professional business of ASUCD nor should it be construed to have any effect on the same whatsoever. The authors of this article additionally do not presume to have any knowledge of the sociel lives of Senators and does not actually intend to cause their social lives to be believed to be dead.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 10:08 pm (UTC)or it would be if it were true. one can never tell, due to your silly "disclaimers."
no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-04 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-05 01:38 am (UTC)mesofunny!
and another thing...
wow, I want to reiterate.... mesofunny!
Re: and another thing...
Date: 2003-12-05 01:39 am (UTC)Re: and another thing...
Date: 2003-12-05 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-05 12:11 am (UTC)Chosen Echidna
Date: 2003-12-05 01:41 am (UTC)Re: Chosen Echidna
Date: 2003-12-05 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-12-05 02:05 am (UTC)@(*&@*#
No hot girls in the audience were like: ooo that shid guy... YEAAAAAH!!!
wait, I have no idea, did any of this happen?
I suggest death
Date: 2003-12-05 02:15 am (UTC)Re: I suggest death
Date: 2003-12-05 02:18 am (UTC)Re: I suggest death
Date: 2003-12-05 02:18 am (UTC)no subject
brilliant - so when do livejournals become admissible evidence is court?
guess i better stop planning murders on mine
livejournal as admissible evidence
Date: 2003-12-05 11:16 pm (UTC)Its important to note the difference between investigating someone's "public" claims on livejournal to purportedly actual illegal activities, and persecuting someone for the non-illegal CONTENT itself of the livejournal. The latter case, which was the situation I found myself at the bad end of, is inherently ridiculous.
But yes, I'm serious, if you are doing anything illegal enough to pique the interest of the police, I recommend you don't write about it, in public entries anyway.
DISCLAIMER: this comment in no way endorses participation in illegal activities.
Proof that College Chancellors are creepy
Date: 2003-12-05 07:31 pm (UTC)Re: Proof that College Chancellors are creepy
Date: 2003-12-05 11:07 pm (UTC)Re: Proof that College Chancellors are creepy
Date: 2003-12-06 08:01 pm (UTC)Re: Proof that College Chancellors are creepy
Date: 2003-12-06 09:33 pm (UTC)Re: Proof that College Chancellors are creepy
Date: 2003-12-07 09:49 pm (UTC)