The Coming Polydactyl Dystopia
Feb. 27th, 2023 10:38 pm The classics of science fiction such as Asimov always envisioned robots that were physically more capable than humans, more precise at mathemetical calculations, but faced with an unsurmountable challenge to match humanity in the creative arts. How ironic it is then, that they seem to have achieved the latter first. The surprising ability of "chatgpt" to produce human-like writing to match any prompt has been making the news for the last two or three weeks, and a popular science fiction publisher has had to stop taking submissions due to the inundation of submissions of AI generated content. Similarly pictures, "paintings" or "photographs" and everything in between, can also be generated by AI now to a degree that can usually pass for non-AI content (see also, headline today: instagram-famous photographer confesses he's been using AI to generate the "photos"). Weirdly, AI's one weakness seems to be that it keeps giving people too many fingers -- I've never understood how captchas (identify the boxes with crosswalks or garbled letters I can barely decipher after several tries) are somehow too much for computers to handle (they seem like tasks AI image recognition would actually be better than people at), but maybe the secret is to make the user draw a hand. Anyway, I for one am in great fear of our new polydactyl overlords.
Back when robots were just taking physical jobs it wasn't much of a bad thing really. There were some fears of it causing unemployment sure, but in theory society should be able to find those people new more fulfilling jobs or maybe look after them with a universal income -- it's hard to stand back and say repetitive jobs being lost to robots is a bad thing. Future dystopias, always a popular genre, usually focused on the robots taking over and becoming evil and either enslaving people (for some reason), or just declaring that they are an unnecessary and inefficient bother or something.
The alternative, the course we seem to actually be on (of course we're on the unimaginably-worse-than-they-imagined timeline, because of course we are), is that AI will actually replace _creative_ occupations and hobbies first. We still don't have the fun anthropoid robots the sci fi promised us walking around being helpful, but if trying to find success in creative writing or art wasn't already hard enough now we will be inundated by AI technology that is looking like it may soon be better at it than us.
And not only that. I already get whatsapp messages from people, representing themselves to be cute girls in Singapore usually, saying they "accidentally" messaged me by wrong number and trying to befriend me while also urging me to invest in crypto. Right now I assume there's actual humans on a keyboard at the other end (I picture a particularly hairy man). I'm sure the mass use of AI "conversation making" technology by chatbots is just around the corner. And I doubt they'll limit themselves to "accidentally messaging a wrong number." They'll be lurking around playing games, posting content on instagram, basically floating around the internet acting like people. I envision an alarming time in the not too distant future where unless you actually meet someone in person you literally can't be sure they're a real person.
I feel like someone needs to write a new great science fiction novel about this new dystopia we're headed into ... before a computer writes it first.
no subject
Date: 2023-02-27 12:25 pm (UTC)In the not too distance future at the HQ of the human resistance to the robots, a “person” approaches the checkpoint.
“Stop!” The guard shouts, pointing their EMP gun at the stranger.
“I’m human!” The stranger calls out.
“An Italian Renaissance painting of a woman in a field, how many fingers on her right hand?”
“Six, no seven!” The visitor shouts.
The EMP gun whines and another “body” is pushed down the hill to join the others.
“I hope they never figure it out,” the officer says, stepping out of the door.
“I’ve never once had one say four,” the guard says.
The officer raises their gun and looks suspiciously at the guard.
“Plus a thumb!” The guard quickly shouts.
“That’s a different argument,” the officer said, and they both relax.
no subject
Date: 2023-02-27 12:28 pm (UTC)Ahahahaha that's fantastic.
no subject
Date: 2023-03-01 04:48 pm (UTC)That is brilliant.
no subject
Date: 2023-02-27 03:29 pm (UTC)Learn more about LiveJournal Ratings in FAQ (https://www.dreamwidth.org/support/faqbrowse?faqid=303).
no subject
Date: 2023-02-28 12:11 am (UTC)I do not fear robots writing fiction. And clearly the people submitting Chatgpt stories were people who 1) wanted to be writers and failed, or 2) thought they could get something past real editors and failed.
no subject
Date: 2023-02-28 12:57 am (UTC)The believed motive for the submissions is apparently so an AI developer can crow that their AI got a story published.
no subject
Date: 2023-02-28 03:05 pm (UTC)The copyright question throws an interesting wrinkle into this. A case went to I believe the SCOTUS last week where it was determined that AI-generated work is not eligible for copyright protection because a computer is not a human. If they can't make money off it I imagine industry will lose interest right quick. But since we all know who owns the government, they may also push for change to be more favorable to big business like everything else.
But I agree all in all it is a disconcerting time and in the end, small creators are the ones who stand to lose.
no subject
Date: 2023-03-01 04:50 pm (UTC)Don't forget the sixty teeth, all incisors.