aggienaut: (Default)
So ereyesterday I had discovered the beautiful art of Robert Walsh, which I thought would be nice to illustrate The Apinautica. It further occurred to me that my moral objections to AI don't apply so much to art that is based on stuff already in the public domain, so let's see if the AI can create art in the style of Robert Walsh. I consulted my computer savvy friend Mick and he recommended bing copilot as being free and able to be used immediately. We begin with already its third attempt at Cappadocia:

20240507-WA0018.jpeg

20240507-WA0018.jpeg



   Look at that, it knows what it's done! I haven't even brought up hot air balloons and its immediately making excuses!!



   At this point I gave up. I suppose its gratifying really to find that it seems, at least if this AI is representative of others, that it cannot seem to make art that doesn't "look like AI," mimic a specific artist's style well, or, apparently, resist the uncontrollable urge to include hot air balloons.

   Also I realize there's no reason to be polite to the AI but I rather feel like how you address even the AI reflects upon yourself. I'd feel dirty just shouting orders at it.

Wait, one more!

aggienaut: (Default)

   The classics of science fiction such as Asimov always envisioned robots that were physically more capable than humans, more precise at mathemetical calculations, but faced with an unsurmountable challenge to match humanity in the creative arts. How ironic it is then, that they seem to have achieved the latter first. The surprising ability of "chatgpt" to produce human-like writing to match any prompt has been making the news for the last two or three weeks, and a popular science fiction publisher has had to stop taking submissions due to the inundation of submissions of AI generated content. Similarly pictures, "paintings" or "photographs" and everything in between, can also be generated by AI now to a degree that can usually pass for non-AI content (see also, headline today: instagram-famous photographer confesses he's been using AI to generate the "photos"). Weirdly, AI's one weakness seems to be that it keeps giving people too many fingers -- I've never understood how captchas (identify the boxes with crosswalks or garbled letters I can barely decipher after several tries) are somehow too much for computers to handle (they seem like tasks AI image recognition would actually be better than people at), but maybe the secret is to make the user draw a hand. Anyway, I for one am in great fear of our new polydactyl overlords.


   Back when robots were just taking physical jobs it wasn't much of a bad thing really. There were some fears of it causing unemployment sure, but in theory society should be able to find those people new more fulfilling jobs or maybe look after them with a universal income -- it's hard to stand back and say repetitive jobs being lost to robots is a bad thing. Future dystopias, always a popular genre, usually focused on the robots taking over and becoming evil and either enslaving people (for some reason), or just declaring that they are an unnecessary and inefficient bother or something.
   The alternative, the course we seem to actually be on (of course we're on the unimaginably-worse-than-they-imagined timeline, because of course we are), is that AI will actually replace _creative_ occupations and hobbies first. We still don't have the fun anthropoid robots the sci fi promised us walking around being helpful, but if trying to find success in creative writing or art wasn't already hard enough now we will be inundated by AI technology that is looking like it may soon be better at it than us.

   And not only that. I already get whatsapp messages from people, representing themselves to be cute girls in Singapore usually, saying they "accidentally" messaged me by wrong number and trying to befriend me while also urging me to invest in crypto. Right now I assume there's actual humans on a keyboard at the other end (I picture a particularly hairy man). I'm sure the mass use of AI "conversation making" technology by chatbots is just around the corner. And I doubt they'll limit themselves to "accidentally messaging a wrong number." They'll be lurking around playing games, posting content on instagram, basically floating around the internet acting like people. I envision an alarming time in the not too distant future where unless you actually meet someone in person you literally can't be sure they're a real person.


   I feel like someone needs to write a new great science fiction novel about this new dystopia we're headed into ... before a computer writes it first.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6 7 89101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 01:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios