aggienaut: (Default)

   Continuing to think about Star Trek parodies, I realized "The Orville" is on Disney+ to which we subscribe, which I'd heard was supposed to be a close parody to Star Trek that aims to be irreverent in ways ST can't be. So I watched a few episodes... it wasn't terrible but it just felt like I was watching off-brand temu-Star-Trek, and other than characters trying to make jokes nothing actually funny occurred. And this whole gag that his ex-wife is his first officer is pretty ham-fistedly handled with melodrama in the first episode and thereafter a minor detail. It wasn't terrible, if I had copious amounts of time I wanted to fill with mindless nonsense maybe I'd watch more episodes but I doubt I will because I reserve what time I can spare for concentrated nonsense -- namely, chatgpt writes much funnier scripts than this.

   So since the previous installment I had posted here I've continued to have ChatGPT run my crew of philosophers (and some friends from real life and such) through classic Star Trek episodes, further refining it after each one. A key achievement I think comparing what its writing now with what I had posted before is less completely random funny pseudo-gibberish -- its gradually getting more coherent. There were a few really funny quotes but when I recently went back to find them I found I can't access the history after only a few episodes back so they may be lost. Anyway here's the latest iteration. The name USS Nimrod was my idea, well, as were a lot of things other than incidental occurrences, it really requires careful guidance to actually get anywhere.

Read more... )

aggienaut: (Default)

   So I was recently playing around with ChatGPT since it's been updated since I last played around with it a bit. While I'm in general horrified about the implications of people using ChatGPT to create content, I wanted to explore its capabilities. It's interesting because while it can create a pretty good little short story on demand, thinking about what said output is _missing_ and trying to push it to improve that is an interesting exercise that probably benefits the human writer.
   To make its answers not just pollyanna imaginings without context, I'd kept all my previous questions to it in one chat and told it directly to reference previous topics as much as possible. I had recently been asking it about the philosophies of various philosophers so they featured prominently which I really liked.

   We'll skip the first few stories which involved Socrates, Diogenes, and some other characters in ancient Greece trying to thwart Eloncles, a musk merchant (see what I did there? ChatGPT, otherwise insightful, refuses to make any connections) attempting to import various products with dire biosecurity consequences (I told you its based significantly on previous conversations I'd had with it). Originally "a squirrel farmer" was a background character and then I suggested the already introduced scheming merchant was dealing in musk from these squirrels. In the last iteration before we travel to space the musk had taken on some interesting properties akin to the Spice Melange of Frank Herbert's Dune series. Anyway the following results I think are entertaining and ultimately had me laughing to hard I had tears in my eyes.

   We'll begin wherein I've asked it to put noted philosopher, founder of "cynism" Diogenes, in the "unwinnable situation" from Star Trek, the Kobayashi Maru scenario. I'll make occasional changes to its version with [] brackets.

Philosophers In Space )



   And what conclusions can we draw from this about the future of AI and AI assisted writing? Well I think it can create interesting content that is worth reading but only with careful prompting. Generally any attempts to make it write something without a lot of steering has created content that's just dumb and pollyanna. I certainly wouldn't have been able to make all this in just a few collective minutes (this was through the day I'd have it make me an interation and then spend the next hour or two carefully thinking how I could steer it then next direction while otherwise going through my workday and then take a moment to give it the next prompt), but the fact that this could go on forever highlights another fundamental thing about writing -- it needs curation. People don't have infinite time to read things, human producers of writing were forced to curate because of the time involved, tehy'd carefully produce the best they could in the time available, with AI content creation one could create a firehose of content, and it would still take a human to make the cuts to present an audience with the appropriate amount of it. And, well, that's promising for me as an editor.


See also, previous (drawn) zany adventures in space.

aggienaut: (Default)
So ereyesterday I had discovered the beautiful art of Robert Walsh, which I thought would be nice to illustrate The Apinautica. It further occurred to me that my moral objections to AI don't apply so much to art that is based on stuff already in the public domain, so let's see if the AI can create art in the style of Robert Walsh. I consulted my computer savvy friend Mick and he recommended bing copilot as being free and able to be used immediately. We begin with already its third attempt at Cappadocia:

20240507-WA0018.jpeg

20240507-WA0018.jpeg



   Look at that, it knows what it's done! I haven't even brought up hot air balloons and its immediately making excuses!!



   At this point I gave up. I suppose its gratifying really to find that it seems, at least if this AI is representative of others, that it cannot seem to make art that doesn't "look like AI," mimic a specific artist's style well, or, apparently, resist the uncontrollable urge to include hot air balloons.

   Also I realize there's no reason to be polite to the AI but I rather feel like how you address even the AI reflects upon yourself. I'd feel dirty just shouting orders at it.

Wait, one more!

aggienaut: (Default)

   The classics of science fiction such as Asimov always envisioned robots that were physically more capable than humans, more precise at mathemetical calculations, but faced with an unsurmountable challenge to match humanity in the creative arts. How ironic it is then, that they seem to have achieved the latter first. The surprising ability of "chatgpt" to produce human-like writing to match any prompt has been making the news for the last two or three weeks, and a popular science fiction publisher has had to stop taking submissions due to the inundation of submissions of AI generated content. Similarly pictures, "paintings" or "photographs" and everything in between, can also be generated by AI now to a degree that can usually pass for non-AI content (see also, headline today: instagram-famous photographer confesses he's been using AI to generate the "photos"). Weirdly, AI's one weakness seems to be that it keeps giving people too many fingers -- I've never understood how captchas (identify the boxes with crosswalks or garbled letters I can barely decipher after several tries) are somehow too much for computers to handle (they seem like tasks AI image recognition would actually be better than people at), but maybe the secret is to make the user draw a hand. Anyway, I for one am in great fear of our new polydactyl overlords.


   Back when robots were just taking physical jobs it wasn't much of a bad thing really. There were some fears of it causing unemployment sure, but in theory society should be able to find those people new more fulfilling jobs or maybe look after them with a universal income -- it's hard to stand back and say repetitive jobs being lost to robots is a bad thing. Future dystopias, always a popular genre, usually focused on the robots taking over and becoming evil and either enslaving people (for some reason), or just declaring that they are an unnecessary and inefficient bother or something.
   The alternative, the course we seem to actually be on (of course we're on the unimaginably-worse-than-they-imagined timeline, because of course we are), is that AI will actually replace _creative_ occupations and hobbies first. We still don't have the fun anthropoid robots the sci fi promised us walking around being helpful, but if trying to find success in creative writing or art wasn't already hard enough now we will be inundated by AI technology that is looking like it may soon be better at it than us.

   And not only that. I already get whatsapp messages from people, representing themselves to be cute girls in Singapore usually, saying they "accidentally" messaged me by wrong number and trying to befriend me while also urging me to invest in crypto. Right now I assume there's actual humans on a keyboard at the other end (I picture a particularly hairy man). I'm sure the mass use of AI "conversation making" technology by chatbots is just around the corner. And I doubt they'll limit themselves to "accidentally messaging a wrong number." They'll be lurking around playing games, posting content on instagram, basically floating around the internet acting like people. I envision an alarming time in the not too distant future where unless you actually meet someone in person you literally can't be sure they're a real person.


   I feel like someone needs to write a new great science fiction novel about this new dystopia we're headed into ... before a computer writes it first.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 1011 12
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 12:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios