aggienaut: (soldiers)

Phase 1: All Fun And Games
   Last week there was a rally at Davis. In fact I think there were several. People may have even gotten arrested. However, they were all overshadowed by something a small group of the Davis College Republicans ("DCR") did.
   DCR held an "illegal-immigration" themed game of tag. One side played the INS, and the other played the unlawful immigrants. Team INS had to play with their hands behind their back, and every ten minutes all captured illegal immigrants were granted amnesty and set free.
   As far as I'm concerned, this seems to be a completely ligitimate and create way to express the policy viewpoint that the organizers have, ie that the INS is unable to do their job because they have their "hands tied" in various ways and the periodic amnesties make stemming the tide especially hopeless (in their opinion). Its a policy viewpoint and whether or not one agrees with it, its not crazy.
   However, liberals on campus just about had a kineption, declaring the event "unaccptable." This, ironically, gave the event more publicity previous to the rallies, more press coverage during the rallies, and a lot more press coverage following the rallies, than the rallies themselves.


Phase 2: An ASUCD Inquisition
   Now it just so happened that one Pete Markovich participated with the Republicans in the rally. Markovich, however, is the Chair of the ASUCD Academic Affairs Commission, and in ASUCD, you practice political expression at your own risk. For his participation in the DCR event, Markovich has been called before a Senate closed hearing at today's meeting.
   Organizers of the witch-hunt (which appears to be Andrew Peake and Molly Fluet) initially publicly said at last weeks Senate meeting that they were going to attempt to fire Markovich, but are now apparently considering pushing for a censure instead, which would be easier to get (as it wouldn't entail losing a good commission chair). Additionally, the procedures in the bylaws for censure call for a closed session significantly WITHOUT the defendant having the right to an open session that removal allows. Considering that so many people have expressed an interest in coming to this meeting (There is of course an "I Support Pete" facebook group) that the meeting has been moved to Freeborn auditorium the Coffee House (6pm). (as of 12:26pm the day of)
   Also in the bylaws for censure are several problems -- such as that the procedure currently only applies to elected officials (ie the P/VP & Senators), not appointed Commission Chairs; AND notification of a defendant that he's being considered for censure must be done two days prior to the meeting -- something that was not done. The Senate will have to suspend the bylaws in order to burn Markovich at the stake in this manner. They have, however, covered their bases by initiating the normal removal procedures against him.
   Incidentally, because it occured to them that a public censure was a bit like publicizing a personnel issue, they decided to opt for "rei censure" (as opposed to the other centure in the bylaws, "personae censure"), which focuses on the action rather than the personality of the person. Aside from the fact that I don't think this clears the taboo of publicizing evaluations of personnel's actions, I think they made it up!! -- despite searching the depths of the internets I could not find a single reference to censures being divided into "rei" and "personae."

   Furthermore, as the legendary Igor Birman, Esq, notes:

   ...California Labor Code Section 1101 prohibits employers from controlling, directing, or tending to direct, the political activities of its employees. Labor Code Section 1102 prohibits employers from firing, or threatening to fire, their employees in order to coerce them into following, or refraining from following, any particular course or line of political actions or political activity.
   Furthermore, in a 1979 landmark decision, the California Supreme Court held that these code
sections "serve to protect the 'fundamental right of employees in general to engage in political activity without interference from employers.'" Gay Law Students Assn. v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co., 24 Cal.3d 458, 487 (1979).
   [Senate] actions to interfere with the course of Mr. Markevich’s employment, whether by dismissal, other sanction or even by commencing proceedings to discuss sanctions would be in gross violation of state labor laws, as well as Federal Civil Rights statutes. As such, [these] actions would open ASUCD to state and federal litigation and corresponding penalties. ...

   And other than the legal issues, for my part I think those who are pushing to persecute Markovich for his views at best lack a functional ethical-compass.

aggienaut: (asucd)

   Picking up where I left off, no less than ten minutes after making my addendum to last entry, I met with my roommate Adrian and some friends of his where they were sitting with their guitars on the quad. There, with a number of other bystanders, we were amused for about 40 minutes by the antics of a crazy religious man on the quad.

   Unlike other crazy religious men, this one actually referred to himself as a prophet or oracle. He alternated between shouting his sermon at the local student traffic, occasionally singing, and at one point suddenly adopting a conversational tone for five minutes. Adrian used his new tape-recorder & attached microphone to record most of it.

   At one point I hippie tried to offer him a cup of water but he pointedly refused to make eye contact with the hippie, turning his back to him continually and addressing the crowd in different directions.

   Eventually a someone from SPAC (Student Programs & Activities Center I believe), a girl who looked to be a student herself, came to tell him that he had to speak on the other corner of the quad, the "free speech corner" to which they always attempt to exile counterprotestors ("Yes, you CAN counterprotest, but over there in the appropriate designated location ::points to distant and forlorn corner of quad::") and other undesirables .
   To these attempts the crazy religious man responded "this is America, I preach whereever I want.. we have this thing called freedom of speech in America, I don't know how they do things in Somoa or whereever you're from" followed shortly by "you're not very pretty you know."
   I don't think Jesus would approve of those latter comments.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6 7 89101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 09:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios