aggienaut: (asucd)

   Previously, proponents of the override of the qualifications for office have strongly advocated that we all put it behind us, and maintained there'd be no public outrage. Today the Aggie pwned them in three articles (Senators-Elect Take Office Due to Retroactive Legislation, Editorial: Actions Diminish Associations Credibility and ASUCD Election Never Certified (letter to editor)). This evening Friends Urging Campus Kindness Senator Birdsall notified all officers who had dissented againt the Senate actions that they will be considered for removal this Thursday...

This Thursday the Senate will have my removal on their agenda.


   I have no idea what I'm charged with.

aggienaut: (star destroyer)

   So I woke up this morning filled with regret over somethign I'd done the night before. Filled with regrets and second-thoughts. And my internet access was down so I couldn't see how bad it was, but I had a feeling that I'd written a rash and overly saucy theological rant the night before. Anyway I finally got around to looking it (in the computer lab) and its not as bad as I'd feared, so I'm going to go ahead and make some more saucy comments.

   But first to reemphasize from last night, and on further contemplation since then, I think the single most underrated misunderstanding in the history of theology is whether or not it sounds like it would be a pleasant arrangement has absolutely no bearing on whether or not something is theologically true.


   But now to cause controversy in another area. Military recruitment at universities. For the past two weeks or more the letters to the editor in the California Aggie have been filled with arguments back and forth on this subject. In particular I'd like to single todays letter by one Leah Sicat out for ridicule. Her thesis statement: "alternative information about the military is rarely provided to students. Usually the good side about the military, rather than its connection to war, is presented.   So, what does she want, a warning label similarly to the "caution: hot" found on coffee cups? Caution: military duty may involve war? I mean I try to think of the alternatives when someone argues against something and two occur to me on this subject: (1) as Sicat advocates, have them deliver a stern disclaimer to potential recruits, or (2) the more commonly advocated removal of them from universities. As to point one, I can hardly imagine it being anything other than just that, a stern warning that joining the military isn't a decision to be taken lightly and may bring the participant under hostile fire in a foreign war. I must say however, that I think they should already know that and it seems like a silly solution, though easily implemented if one feels its really prudent.
   And as to point two, this implies there are better places for recruiters to hang out ... like high schools?? If one's believes, as Licat and many others seem to, that military recruiters exploit those who don't see any other opportunities for themselves, it seems like this solution would have the opposite of the intended affect. In conclusion on this point, I think university students are probably much better prepared to intelligently consider the offers of military recruiters than potential other audiences, and more likely to have other opportunities and thus not be compelled to join through "lack of other opportunities."
   And for a grande finale of ruining my sensitivity credentials, two more bonus points. Firstly I'd like to note that Licat refers to herself and others as "students of colour" throughout her article, a term which I personally find racist as it describes persons of european descent as being "colourless" and inherently different from everyone else. But moreover, I'd like to mention the perpetual argument that people join the military for the "opportunities" and are then exploited when they are sent into military operations. There is one reason and one reason only people are paid to be in the military: to fight, or to be prepared to fight. During peace time, military personnel are maintained and paid beyond their necessity because they are being paid to be PREPARED to fight when needed. If one joins the military for the opportunities, but is not prepared to fight, one is being paid for something they are representing to have but in fact do not -- they are committing nothing short of fraud. The military is not a welfare organization whose purpose is simply to provide jobs.

   In other news, my little brother is currently on his second tour of duty in Iraq. Apparently he'd injured his hand before heading out there again, but didn't tell anyone lest it cause him not to be sent to Iraq. I must say that his courage and honest desire to fulfill his duties makes me very proud.

aggienaut: (nuke)

   I've actually been too busy to write livejournal entries for several days ::gasp:: so now I have at least three I want to write.

   First order of business, according to her letter to the editor today, one Lily Johnson thinks I have no right to discuss matters related to tomato harvesting because I am "a priviledged white male who probably has never worked a day of hard labour in his life."
   Before we go any further let me say that first and foremost, I see the use of my ethnicity as an insult against me in this context as nothing short of racism. If I started a letter to the editor with "so and so can't know what they are talking about because they are a [insert nonwhite ethnicity here]..." I'd have torch bearing mobs outside my apartment in no time. In this context my ethnicity is not relevant except for the implication that because of it I am fundamentally incapable of understanding certain issues.
   Furthermore, I am on full financial aid. By definition therefore, I am not "priviledged" (unless being poor is a priviledge?).

   As to the rest of what Johnson has to say, I am in agreement with. Except where she calls me intellectually bankrupt. I'd venture that I probably know more about the case in discussion than she does. The boycott of Taco Bell was called for by the workers of Immokalee Florida in response to the excessive exploitation they are faced with there (the Immokalee farms are one of several sources Taco Bell receives tomatoes from). Even if one believes the boycott to be ill-suited towards their goals, I don't think anyone could blame them for trying everything they can. The real problem here, as I see it, more than the specific plight of the Immokalee farmworkers, is the fact that the National Labour Relations Act (NLRA) specifically doesn't apply to agricultural labourers. Ag workers therefore have few institutional guarantees to decent conditions.
   As to boycotting Taco Bell, I'm not saying one shouldn't do that if they understand the issue. I still firmly believe that the flyer campaign urged people to do so for a completely erronious reason --that farmworkers are breaking their backs under bicentinarian bells-- and if one is going to make a statement on a social interest they ought to do it for the correct reasons.

   But all this is really overshadowed in considering Johnson's letter by the fact that she exhibited a reprehensible case of racism.


   I do not plan on writing another letter to the editor at this point, but if someone else wants to point out the abominable racism exhibited here in their own letter I would certainly be pleased.


PS: I sincerely doubt Miss "Lily" Johnson, if that IS her real name (and its not) has spent a day at manuel labour either so I don't see how she has an angle on me with that. Being a Native American Studies major does not give one a blank check to claim to understand oppressive conditions of all types.

aggienaut: (WTF)

Letter to the Editor? -- see submitted version in comments
   Flyers and chalkings currently cover our campus, declaring "Tomato pickers carry the equivalent of two liberty bells (4000 lbs) a day for only $50 -- Boycott Taco Bell!!" While the image of a tired worker carrying two huge bells is one that certainly offends one's sense of what farm workers should be doing, I'd like to point out that the alarming propaganda is actually quite misleading. Obviously, the workers are not carrying two tons of tomatoes at one time as implied by the image. In fact, lets do some math: say they work for 12 hours per day, that works out to about 55 pounds of tomatoes, a large basket (a "bushel basket" to be precise), every ten minutes. Certainly they'd be very busy, and I'm sure their task isn't a pleasant one, but its not comparable to the shocking image of carting around two huge bicentinarian bells, and boycotting Taco Bell will certainly not help them.

###


   Incidently, the US Supreme Court in 1893 declared that tomatoes are vegetables, not fruit (Nix v Hedden). Personally, I find this case to be a shocking convolution of botanical fact.


   Justice Raff and I were sitting in the MU today, and Raff was ranting about his disagreement with a certain article in the opinion section of the Aggie. He resolved to write a letter to the editor, which hopefully will appear on Thursday, but then we were faced with the question of what his title would be (in signed in the letter), as he's currently the Court's second in command -- Alternate Presiding Justice? Alternate Chief Justice? Vice Chief Justice? Lieutenant Chief Justice? Would that make me Captain Justice?? We decided I'd need a cape if we went with that route.


   In other news, opinion columnist Russ Fagely thinks America should get over the groundhog day ritual. I think Fagely should stop hating on groundhogs.


   Also today, we actually had an AGASA meeting again.


Previously on EMOSNAIL
   Two Years Ago Today:
Scarf Party - and my heater is broken
   One Year Ago Today: Amie's Dance Party - whereupon [livejournal.com profile] codetoad and [livejournal.com profile] pavelthegeek are "quite abundant."

aggienaut: (holiday)

   In response to this interchange, which I thuoght was over, I recently got another email from the same source:

Hello again from The Dr. Bob Jones Institute www.docbojo.com

Previously your website and/or organization was ordered to CEASE and DESIST by the Dr. Bob Jones Institute for being Biblically errant. Our BJI Board of Theological Scholars had found you to be outside our perimeters of accepted CHRISTIAN THEOCRATIC accountability and well on your way to HELL. These conclusions were based upon the direct commands from our LORD and SAVIOR, JESUS CHRIST. I, as Director of Operations at the BJI am only the messenger and it was my duty to so inform you. You were given an opportunity to bring your thinking into line with the CORRECT dogmatic precepts of BJI as directed by Christ and we are pleased to announce that YOU have been judged to have done so. These conclusion are based on the many apologetic and confessional responses this office as received from your ilk. Also, Christ is a compassionate and forgiving MASTER and he has made known to the Board of Elders BJI on CORRECT THEOLOGY those that HE hath forgiven for past indiscretions. Some of your organizations were actually ATHEIST groups but JESUS in his LOVE for you has granted forgiveness just as he did the whores and common criminals he forgave in the days HE was upon this earth. Praise HIS NAME and you are darn lucky as I personally would not have been so kind. Consequently, we now announce you may re-establish your WebPages/Organizations AND AS A SPECIAL REWARD for your 'seeing the light' as JESUS so ordered you through BJI, your webpage and/or organization shall now be posted at www.docbojo.com as a link to our powerful CHRISTIAN THEOCRATIC ORGANIZATION. You will find your name listed on the BJI Home page LIST OF LIFE. You are now a whole hearted supporter of the Dr. Bob Jones Institute as is the Bob Jones University and so many others. You have been FORGIVEN! God bless you and congratulations.

michael c. kelley
director of operations, BJI
Arkansas



   I believe there are two possible explanations for this:
1) It's a form-letter sent to all sources that they have identified as having mistakenly been sent their "cease and desisit" form-letter earlier.
2) What I see as more plausible, Jesus himself has interceded on my behalf versus the born-agains. Hey, it happens.


"I Like to Whitewash Oppression and Murder"
   Conservative Aggie columnist Ian Watson published an article today entirely dedicated to how I am an ignorant ogre.
   You see, he apparently saw me the other day wearing the Aeroflot shirt Kristy got me for christmas, and it sent him into a delirious rage. I'm thinking about writing a letter to the editor in response to his column, pointing out that Aeroflot is just an airline, and one that has offered The People ridiculously low air fare in the past, thus allowing the proletariat a chance to traverse the vast Soviet empire in ways they never would have otherwise been able to. Also, the hammer and sickle is not same as a swastika: nazis were first and foremost racist, the soviets were not, and that in my opinion makes them incomparable. Not that I'm saying the Soviet union was divine and I advocate world communist revolution, I just think Ian Watson is overreacting to an airline shirt.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6 7 89101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 06:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios